What is it about New
Orleans Councilwoman Stacy Head that infuriates so many “activists” in New Orleans? Is it her insistence on accurate
information and her intolerance for bureaucratic incompetence? Or is it her
direct, no nonsense manner and confrontations with New Orleans Sanitation
Director Veronica White?
Whatever the reason, she has
become an inviting political target. While the vast majority of people who have
interacted with her have a high regard for how her office operates, Head had to
endure a failed recall campaign. Despite strong support from many African
American leaders in her district, Head has been unfairly labeled a racist.
Her latest opponent is lawyer and
activist Tracie Washington, who posted a few of Head’s e-mail communications on
her group’s website. The stunt was designed to embarrass Head as much as
possible and cause her significant political damage. It is too early to
determine the political fallout for Head after the selective release of these
inflammatory e-mails.
In the e-mails, Head complained
about the city’s incompetent technology chief, Anthony Jones, who lied about
his credentials, but was still on the city payroll and receiving $80,000 per
year. She also blasted her council colleague Jackie Clarkson, community
activist Jerome Smith and related an upsetting incident involving a “chick”
using food stamps at a grocery store.
After posting the e-mails for
several hours, Washington removed them from her website. Washington released
the e-mails even though the State Supreme Court
blocked the distribution of the messages. The Supreme
Court action came after the 4th Circuit
Court of Appeal overruled District Court Judge
Lloyd Medley and gave permission for Washington to release the 400,000
e-mails.
This whole episode is a rather
troubling insight into the racial politics of New Orleans. In her initial
public records request, Washington only targeted white
council members and did not solicit the e-mails of any of the African
American council members. Washington secured the e-mails only through the
cooperation of Veronica White, who despises Stacy Head. It is outrageous that
the Sanitation Director would be involved in such a record request. For this
offense, she should have been fired, but, sadly, White remains on the city
payroll with her bloated salary.
The release circumvented the
procedure for handling public records requests. The city attorney’s office was
not informed until the e-mails had already been released. To make matters
worse, Washington posted the e-mails despite the ruling of the State Supreme
Court.
This whole situation is being
examined by federal investigators who want to determine whether the e-mails
were released improperly. Ms. White’s computers have been seized and there
could be more scandalous developments involving this case.
The real blame lies with the
Nagin administration which failed to stop the improper release of these
records. An activist looking to target Stacy Head should not have been allowed
to receive 400,000 e-mails in a matter of hours.
In contrast, WWL-TV and other
stations have been denied access to vital public records involving Mayor
Nagin. Only portions of his calendar
were initially released, as Nagin tried to redact information about his meetings
with controversial politicians such as former State Senator Cleo Fields.
Implausibly, Nagin’s office deleted most of the Mayor’s e-mails citing storage
problems. This excuse is ridiculous since technology experts note that there
are easy ways to deal with computer storage problems.
This case involves an
administration that tried to hide any potential embarrassment for the Mayor,
while simultaneously working with an activist to embarrass a political
opponent. While the Mayor seems delighted that Head is undergoing scrutiny,
hopefully, her constituents will not penalize her for some controversial
e-mails, but will credit her for the outstanding job she has done representing
her district.
After readding a number of emails on various sites, especially on WDSU I say the following:
The quotations from the emails of Ms. Clarkson clearly indicate her status as a consummate politician - making no definitive statements as to her personal beliefs as to the situations in question. However, Ms. Head clearly indicates that she has been doing her research and will speak out on behalf of her constituency and not play the part of a typical politician. Thank you Ms. Head for being strong enough to speak up for the future of this city and the needs of the citizens. We have had enough of the politicians and their constant concern about keeping their office by placating others who may be in the wrong, as Ms. White clearly was and remains to this day. In addition, these emails would not have been marked for deletion insasmuch as they set out actions taken by the individuals as members of the council. However, there still remains the backstage transactions between Ms. Washington and Ms. White in the transfer of the email records. Who provided Ms. Whitworth with the copies? The answer should be provided by WDSU as they are being used while there is a stay from the Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Re:MISSION: DESTROY STACY HEAD May 21 2009 19:37:40
The Times-Picayune can’t escape culpability for this mess. It’s not just the race-obsessed Jarvis DeBerry’s rolling drumbeat, or even the truly stupid editorial the other day, but also the unrelenting myopia of the news coverage itself. I can’t figure out whether the paper is so fixated on the idea of public access that it has lost sight of whether means justify ends, or it has decided that playing gotcha on Stacy is too much of a crowd-pleaser to resist. Either way, it’s a serious failure of journalism.