The candidate who was the first
to enter the mayor’s race became the latest to exit an ever shrinking field.
Last weekend, State Senator Ed Murray (D-New Orleans) joined insurance
executive Leslie Jacobs on the sidelines of the mayor’s race. Recent polls showed
Murray far behind frontrunner Lt. Governor Mitch Landrieu. At one point, Murray
was considered the leading African American candidate; however, he was unable
to raise sufficient funds and decided to fold his tent.
Murray campaigned for Mitch Landrieu
four years ago and he just did not have the “fire in the belly” to attack the
Lt. Governor and make this campaign racially divisive. He also does not have
the personality to run a mayoral campaign. Murray is a perfect legislator,
working behind the scenes to draft and pass legislation. Yet, he is not very
outgoing and is actually quite shy. In contrast, New Orleans voters expect
their mayors to be gregarious, outsized political personalities. Clearly,
Murray does not fit that bill.
Like it or not, race is a strong
indicator of voting patterns in New Orleans . In a city with a large African
American majority, it stands to reason that an African American candidate will
make the run-off. So, Murray ’s withdrawal is a major boost to the chances of
the three remaining African American candidates: Troy Henry, James Perry and
Nadine Ramsey.
Will any of these candidates
catch fire? For Perry and Ramsey, it all depends on whether they can raise the
money in a tough economy and a short time frame. Henry has a personal fortune
he can invest in the race, but he is an unknown who needs time to build name
recognition in the community.
Another candidate who could
benefit is white businessman John Georges. He has a personal fortune and has
not been shy about attacking Landrieu. He did well among African American
voters in the 2007 Governor’s race, but it remains to be seen whether African
American voters will support him in huge numbers in this race.
With Murray ’s withdrawal,
Landrieu is even more of a frontrunner. The question will be whether the other
candidates can force him into a run-off. Recent polls show Landrieu hovering
around the 50% mark needed to avoid a run-off election. He could also benefit
from the possibility that there will be other withdrawals before Election Day.
Clearly, Landrieu benefits from
his family’s political dynasty in Louisiana and especially in New Orleans , his
lofty political position as Lt. Governor and the voter’s remorse from four
years ago. He lost to Nagin in 2006 and the results have been pretty
disappointing for the vast majority of voters. Landrieu has paid his dues in
New Orleans politics, running twice before and losing. For him, the third time
may be the lucky charm. In this election, he is far and away the biggest
political name, running against other candidates who have either never won an
election or won an election without opposition.
With a February 6 election, a
major problem for Landrieu’s challengers is that they are running out of time.
The election will be held in less than one month and there are many
distractions for voters. The candidates need to attract not only money, but
attention and entice voters away from the Saints, the New Year and Mardi Gras.
For Mitch Landrieu, the tight
time schedule is his best friend. If the election were held today, he could
very well become Mayor without a run-off.
Making this race competitive will be a tall
challenge for Landrieu’s opponents; however, they will have opportunities with
upcoming televised forums. If Landrieu makes a big mistake, it might be the
jolt the challengers need to get closer.